The Martyrdom of Polycarp

Estimated date

Polycarp, the aged bishop of Smyrna, is arrested, refuses before the proconsul to curse Christ, and is burned in the stadium. His church describes his death in a letter and keeps his bones and the anniversary of his death.

The account of Polycarp’s death is a letter from the church of Smyrna to the church of Philomelium and to “all the congregations of the Holy and Catholic Church in every place”, taken down by one Evarestus (Martyrdom of Polycarp greeting; 20). Its writers say that they saw what they describe (Martyrdom of Polycarp 13–16).

Polycarp was a link to the first generation. Irenaeus, who had seen him as a boy, says that he was taught by apostles and appointed bishop of Smyrna by them, and that he was “a very old man” when he died (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.3.4). Irenaeus also tells, in a letter that Eusebius quotes, that Polycarp visited Rome in the time of bishop Anicetus, where the two failed to agree on the keeping of Easter and parted in peace (Eusebius, Church History 5.24.16–17).

A persecution had broken out at Smyrna, and the crowd in the stadium, after watching a Christian named Germanicus die, shouted for Polycarp. The letter contrasts him with Quintus, who came forward of his own accord and then gave way: “we do not commend those who give themselves up” (Martyrdom of Polycarp 3–4). Polycarp withdrew to a farm, was betrayed by a servant under torture, had food set before the men sent to arrest him and prayed for two hours before going with them (Martyrdom of Polycarp 5–8).

In the stadium the proconsul urged him to swear by the fortune of Caesar and to curse Christ. He answered: “Eighty and six years have I served Him, and He never did me any injury: how then can I blaspheme my King and my Saviour?” (Martyrdom of Polycarp 9) He declared himself a Christian and was threatened with the beasts and with fire; the crowd then demanded that he be burned alive (Martyrdom of Polycarp 10–12). The letter says that the flames arched around him without consuming him, that an executioner then stabbed him, and that his blood put out the fire (Martyrdom of Polycarp 13–16).

The body was burned so that the Christians should not, as their opponents put it, leave the Crucified and “begin to worship this one”. The writers answer that they adore Christ as the Son of God and love the martyrs as his disciples and followers (Martyrdom of Polycarp 17–18). They gathered the bones, “more precious than the most exquisite jewels”, laid them in a fitting place, and intended to meet there each year on the anniversary of his death (Martyrdom of Polycarp 18). He was, the letter says, the twelfth to be martyred at Smyrna, counting those from Philadelphia (Martyrdom of Polycarp 19).

The letter presents itself as the work of eyewitnesses writing within a year of the death. It shows a church recording a martyr’s death for other churches, keeping his remains and marking the anniversary.

How this is dated

Estimated date. A scholarly estimate from primary evidence, with a margin of years.

The letter itself gives no year. A closing note, which may be a later addition, dates the death to the second day of the month Xanthicus, the seventh day before the Kalends of March (23 February), “a great Sabbath”, when Statius Quadratus was proconsul of Asia (Martyrdom of Polycarp 21). The older translation linked elsewhere in this entry reads “May”. W. H. Waddington, Mémoire sur la chronologie de la vie du rhéteur Aelius Aristide (1867), worked out from other evidence that Quadratus held office in 154–155, which gives 23 February 155; others have reckoned 22 February 156.

Two things pull the other way. Eusebius, in the fourth century, places the martyrdom after the accession of Marcus Aurelius in 161 (Eusebius, Church History 4.14.10–4.15.1). And Irenaeus says that Polycarp visited Rome when Anicetus was bishop (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.3.4). By the lengths of office that Eusebius gives for the bishops before him, Anicetus took office only in the mid-150s (Eusebius, Church History 4.10–11), which leaves little or no room for the visit before February 155. Some historians therefore prefer a date in the 160s. The timeline places the event at 155 and shows 155–156.

Primary sources

Against Heresies

Irenaeus of Lyons · c. AD 180 · Greek, preserved complete only in an early Latin translation

Church History

Eusebius of Caesarea · c. AD 311–325, in successive editions · Greek

Every citation on this page was independently checked against its source on 3 October 2026.

In context

Grows out of

  1. about AD 110, traditional date

Leads to

  1. about AD 180, estimated date

Along the threads

Type to search the whole wiki.