The Muratorian List of New Testament Books
c. AD 170–200, estimated dateEstimated date
A Latin fragment, copied in a manuscript now in Milan, lists the books received in the church as it knew it. It counts four Gospels, Acts and thirteen letters of Paul. If it dates from the late second century, it is the oldest such list to survive.
The text is named after Ludovico Antonio Muratori, who printed it in 1740 from a manuscript in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana in Milan. It fills three pages of a codex of the late seventh or eighth century that otherwise contains works of Eucherius, Ambrose and others (Muratorian Fragment, Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, I 101 sup., fols. 10r–11r). The text begins in the middle of a sentence (Muratorian Fragment, section 1). Because the author speaks of Rome simply as “the city”, the list is usually thought to come from there (Muratorian Fragment, section 2).
What survives opens with the end of a remark about one Gospel and then calls that of Luke “the third book of the Gospel” and that of John, “one of the disciples”, the fourth, so the lost beginning dealt with two others. John, it says, wrote at the urging of his fellow disciples and bishops after a fast and a revelation to the apostle Andrew. The Gospels differ in what they teach, but “there is no difference as regards the faith of believers”, since one Spirit declares in all of them the Lord’s birth, passion, resurrection and two comings (Muratorian Fragment, section 1).
Next come the Acts of the Apostles, written by Luke (Muratorian Fragment, section 2), and the letters of Paul. He wrote to seven churches by name, as John did in the Apocalypse, and so addressed the one church spread through the world; with the letters to Philemon, Titus and Timothy this makes thirteen. Letters to the Laodiceans and Alexandrians are rejected as forgeries in Paul’s name connected with the heresy of Marcion, “for it is not suitable for gall to be mingled with honey” (Muratorian Fragment, section 3).
The list then names Jude, two letters of John, the Wisdom of Solomon, and the Apocalypses of John and of Peter, “though some among us will not have this latter read in the Church”. The Shepherd of Hermas may be read, but not publicly among the prophets or the apostles, because it was written recently. The writings of Valentinus, Basilides, Marcion’s followers and the “Cataphrygians” are refused (Muratorian Fragment, section 4). Hebrews, James and the letters of Peter are not mentioned.
The fragment shows a church that already treated four Gospels, Acts and thirteen letters of Paul as settled, while the edges of the collection were still open. It tests a book by whether it comes from the apostles’ time and whether it is read in the whole church. For a list of exactly the twenty-seven books of the later New Testament, see Athanasius Lists the Twenty-seven Books of the New Testament, of the year 367.
How this is dated
Estimated date. A scholarly estimate from primary evidence, with a margin of years.
The manuscript is dated by the library that holds it to AD 676–750 (Muratorian Fragment, Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, I 101 sup., fols. 10r–11r). The list it copies is older, and how much older is disputed. The main clue in the text is its remark that Hermas wrote the Shepherd “very recently in our times in the city of Rome”, when his brother Pius was bishop there (Muratorian Fragment, section 4). Eusebius places Pius between Hyginus and Anicetus, in the 140s and 150s (Eusebius, Church History 4.10–11). The usual conclusion is that the list was drawn up at or near Rome a generation later, about 170–200, and its rejection of the “Cataphrygians” fits a time when Montanism was a live issue.
Albert C. Sundberg, “Canon Muratori: A Fourth-Century List”, Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973), pp. 1–41, and Geoffrey Mark Hahneman, The Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon (1992), argue instead that it is an eastern list of the fourth century, when comparable catalogues first appear. Everett Ferguson, “Canon Muratori: Date and Provenance”, Studia Patristica 17.2 (1982), pp. 677–683, defends the earlier date, which most scholars still hold. Eckhard J. Schnabel, “The Muratorian Fragment: The State of Research”, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 57 (2014), pp. 231–264, reviews the debate.
Primary sources
The Muratorian Fragment
- Muratorian Fragment, Milan, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, I 101 sup., fols. 10r–11rambrosiana.comperio.it
- Muratorian Fragment, section 1newadvent.org
- Muratorian Fragment, section 2newadvent.org
- Muratorian Fragment, section 3newadvent.org
- Muratorian Fragment, section 4newadvent.org
Church History
- Eusebius, Church History 4.10–11newadvent.org
In context
Grows out of
- about AD 144, traditional date
- about AD 180, estimated date
Leads to
- AD 367, firm date