The House of David Inscription from Tel Dan

Estimated date

A king of Aram sets up a victory stele at Dan in which he claims to have killed a king of Israel and a king of the “House of David”. Found in 1993 and 1994, it is the earliest clear mention of David’s dynasty outside the Bible.

In July 1993 excavators at Tel Dan, the site of ancient Dan, found a broken piece of basalt with Aramaic writing built into a wall (Tel Dan Stele account of the find by Gila Cook, architect of the excavation). Two smaller pieces turned up the following June; the excavators’ reports are named in the note on dating. Together the pieces preserve parts of thirteen lines (Tel Dan Stele lines 1–13) of a royal victory stele, which is now in the Israel Museum (Tel Dan Stele Israel Museum record).

The speaker is a king whose name is lost. He says that the king of Israel had earlier entered his father’s land, that his father died, that the god Hadad made him king and went before him, and that he killed kings who had thousands of chariots and horsemen (Tel Dan Stele lines 2–7). Then come two names, both damaged. One ends in “-ram son of” and is followed, after a gap, by “king of Israel”. The other ends in “-iahu son of” and is followed, after a gap, by “of the House of David” (Tel Dan Stele lines 7–9).

On the usual arrangement of the fragments, the king of Israel can only be Joram son of Ahab, the one king of Israel whose name ends in this way. The king of Judah who died with him was Ahaziah son of Jehoram, and the second name is restored accordingly. Kings says that the two were together at Ramoth-gilead fighting Hazael of Damascus when Joram was wounded (2 Kings 8:28–29), and that Hazael afterwards took Israel’s land east of the Jordan (2 Kings 10:32–33). Hazael is therefore the likely author. One difficulty is that the speaker writes of “my father” as his predecessor, while an Assyrian inscription calls Hazael “son of a nobody” (Shalmaneser III, Annals RIAo 40, i 25–ii 6) and Kings makes him a court official who took the throne (2 Kings 8:7–15).

The stele and Kings disagree about the deaths. In Kings it is Jehu who shoots Joram and orders Ahaziah struck down (2 Kings 9:24–27); on the stele, as it is usually restored, the Aramean king claims both (Tel Dan Stele lines 7–9). The word “killed” survives before the second name; its subject, and the whole verb before the first name, are restored. Taken literally, the two accounts conflict. Kings itself links the two men, since Elijah is told to anoint both Hazael and Jehu as agents of the same judgment (1 Kings 19:15–17).

The words “House of David”, written on the stone as a single word, bytdwd, are what made the find famous. On the usual reading, a neighbouring king, about a century and a half after David, could name the kingdom of Judah after him, as Assyrian scribes named Israel after Omri. The inscription says nothing about David himself. It shows that his dynasty was known by his name, the “house” that Nathan’s oracle promises to him (2 Samuel 7:11–16). A similar reading has been proposed for a broken line of the Mesha Stele (Mesha Stele line 31), where it is far less certain; see Moab’s Revolt and the Mesha Stele.

How this is dated

Estimated date. A scholarly estimate from primary evidence, with a margin of years.

The inscription carries no date and its beginning is lost. If lines 7–9 are rightly restored, it looks back on the deaths of Joram of Israel and Ahaziah of Judah, which fall in 841 BC, the year in which Joram’s successor Jehu paid tribute to Assyria (Shalmaneser III, Annals RIAo 12, lines 21–30). The stele was therefore set up after 841. Hazael was still king of Damascus three years later (Black Obelisk lines 102–104), and Kings has him oppress Israel through the reigns of Jehu and his son (2 Kings 10:32–33; 13:22), so any year in the following decades is possible. The timeline places it about 840 BC.

The excavator Avraham Biran and the epigrapher Joseph Naveh published the first fragment in “An Aramaic Stele Fragment from Tel Dan”, Israel Exploration Journal 43 (1993), pp. 81–98, and the two found in June 1994 in “The Tel Dan Inscription: A New Fragment”, Israel Exploration Journal 45 (1995), pp. 1–18. There they joined the pieces and restored the two royal names; the line numbers used here follow their arrangement. The stele has generally been assigned to Hazael. George Athas, The Tel Dan Inscription: A Reappraisal and a New Interpretation (2003), arranges the fragments differently, dates the stele about 796 BC, assigns it to Hazael’s son Bar-hadad and takes bytdwd as a name for Jerusalem. Most scholars follow Biran and Naveh.

Primary sources

The Tel Dan Stele (“House of David” Inscription)

Set up by a king of Aram-Damascus, probably Hazael · Second half of the ninth century BC · Aramaic · Israel Museum, Jerusalem; collection of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA 1993-3162, 1996-125)

Annals of Shalmaneser III (Other Copies)

Issued in the name of Shalmaneser III · 858–824 BC · Akkadian · Iraq Museum, Baghdad (IM 60497, the Kurbail statue); Istanbul Archaeological Museums (EŞEM 4650, the Assur statue)

The Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone)

Set up by Mesha, king of Moab · Second half of the ninth century BC · Moabite · Musée du Louvre, Paris (AO 5066)

The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

Issued in the name of Shalmaneser III · c. 825 BC · Akkadian · British Museum, London (BM 118885)

Every citation on this page was independently checked against its source on 3 October 2026.

In context

Grows out of

  1. about 1000 BC, traditional date
  2. 841 BC, firm date

Along the threads

Type to search the whole wiki.