The Council of Jerusalem

Estimated date

Acts tells how Paul and Barnabas go up from Antioch to Jerusalem to settle whether Gentile believers must be circumcised, and how the apostles and elders decide that they need not be. Whether the meeting Paul describes in Galatians is the same one is disputed.

The churches founded from Antioch included Gentiles (Acts 14:27). Acts says that men came down from Judea and taught that without circumcision according to the custom of Moses they could not be saved. After sharp argument the church sent Paul, Barnabas and others to the apostles and elders in Jerusalem (Acts 15:1–2).

In Acts the matter is argued before the apostles and elders. Believers from the party of the Pharisees said that the Gentiles must be circumcised and keep the law of Moses (Acts 15:4–6). Peter recalled that God had given the Spirit to Gentiles through his own preaching, and asked why they should be given a yoke that neither their ancestors nor they themselves had been able to bear (Acts 15:7–11). Then James the Just spoke. He quoted words of the prophets about the rest of humankind seeking the Lord and gave his judgement: Gentiles who turn to God should not be troubled, but should abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from what is strangled and from blood (Acts 15:13–21). The quotation is from Amos, where the Hebrew text speaks instead of possessing “the remnant of Edom” (Amos 9:11–12).

Acts gives the text of a letter that carried the decision to the Gentile believers of Antioch, Syria and Cilicia, taken by Judas Barsabbas and Silas. It laid on them “no greater burden” than these four abstentions, with the words “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us” (Acts 15:22–31).

Paul describes in Galatians a visit to Jerusalem at which the circumcision of Gentile believers was at issue; whether it is this meeting or an earlier visit is disputed (see the dating note). He went up “by revelation” with Barnabas, taking Titus, a Greek, and set out privately before the leaders the message he preached to the Gentiles. Titus was not compelled to be circumcised, and Paul says that he did not give way to “false brothers” who had come in to spy on their freedom. The leaders, Paul says, added nothing to him. James, Cephas and John, “reputed to be pillars”, gave him and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship: they should go to the Gentiles, and the others to the circumcised. They asked only that he remember the poor (Galatians 2:1–10).

If the two accounts describe one meeting, they agree on the question, the chief persons and the outcome: circumcision was not required of Gentiles. They differ in several points. Acts describes an assembly of apostles, elders and church, and Paul a private meeting with the leaders. In Acts the church of Antioch sends him; Paul says he went by revelation. Galatians does not mention the letter or its four abstentions. Acts says that Paul delivered the decisions to his churches, and has James cite them again on Paul’s last visit to Jerusalem (Acts 16:4) (Acts 21:25).

Paul goes on to tell of a dispute over how Jewish and Gentile believers were to eat together. When Cephas came to Antioch, he says, he ate with Gentiles until “some people came from James”, then drew back, and Barnabas went with him. Paul opposed Cephas “to his face” (Galatians 2:11–14). Paul’s own rule in 1 Corinthians is that a man called uncircumcised should not be circumcised, and in Acts James repeats the decision on Paul’s last visit to Jerusalem (1 Corinthians 7:18–19) (Acts 21:25).

How this is dated

Estimated date. A scholarly estimate from primary evidence, with a margin of years.

Acts places the meeting between Paul’s first journey and his second, on which he reached Corinth about AD 50; that arrival is tied to the Gallio inscription (see Paul Carries the Gospel into Europe). Allowing for the travel through Asia Minor and Macedonia that Acts describes in between (Acts 15:36–18:1), the meeting falls about AD 48 or 49. Rainer Riesner, Paul’s Early Period: Chronology, Mission Strategy, Theology (1998), puts it in 48; the timeline places it at 49.

Which visit Paul is describing in Galatians 2 is disputed, and the answer affects the dating of his whole career. He says it took place “after a period of fourteen years”, and it is the second visit to Jerusalem that he mentions after his conversion (Galatians 1:18) (Galatians 2:1). In Acts the meeting about circumcision is Paul’s third visit, after a second on which he and Barnabas brought famine relief (Acts 9:26) (Acts 11:29–30) (Acts 15:2). One view identifies the visit of Galatians 2 with the meeting of Acts 15, as J. B. Lightfoot did in Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians (10th ed., 1890). Another identifies it with the famine visit, as William M. Ramsay argued in St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen (1895); on that view the letter to the Galatians may have been written before the meeting described in Acts 15. The narrative below sets the two accounts side by side and does not decide between these views.

Primary sources

Every citation on this page was independently checked against its source on 3 October 2026.

In context

Grows out of

  1. about AD 46 to AD 48, estimated date
  2. about AD 40, estimated date

Leads to

  1. about AD 49, estimated date
  2. about AD 49 to AD 52, estimated date
  3. AD 62, firm date
  4. c. AD 50–120, estimated date
  5. May AD 325, firm date

Along the threads

Type to search the whole wiki.