The First Council of Nicaea
May AD 325, firm dateFirm date
Constantine gathers some three hundred bishops at Nicaea over the teaching of Arius. They confess the Son to be “of one substance with the Father”, agree a common date for Easter and issue twenty canons. Catholic, Orthodox and Reformation churches still appeal to the council.
According to Socrates, Arius, a presbyter of Alexandria, objected to the teaching of his bishop, Alexander of Alexandria. If the Father begot the Son, he argued, the Son had a beginning, and there was a time when he was not (Socrates, Church History 1.5–6). In his own words, “the Son has a beginning, but … God is without beginning” (Theodoret, Church History 1.4). Alexander excommunicated him, and other bishops took sides (Socrates, Church History 1.5–6). Constantine sent Hosius of Cordoba to Alexandria with a letter urging peace (Socrates, Church History 1.7). When that failed he summoned the bishops to Nicaea (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.6–7).
No minutes of the council survive; it is known from its own documents and from what participants wrote afterwards. Eusebius of Caesarea describes bishops from Mesopotamia to Spain; the bishop “of the imperial city”, too old to travel, sent presbyters (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.6–7), whom Socrates names as presbyters of Rome (Socrates, Church History 1.13). Counts of the bishops differ: Eusebius says more than 250 (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.8), Eustathius of Antioch about 270 (Theodoret, Church History 1.7), Athanasius “three hundred more or less” and later 318 (Athanasius, Defence of the Nicene Definition 3) (Athanasius, To the Bishops of Africa 2). By Eusebius’s account Constantine opened the sessions in the palace and joined in the debate (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.10–14).
Eusebius told his own church that he had offered a creed and that the emperor urged its acceptance with one word added, homoousios, “of one substance” (Socrates, Church History 1.8). Athanasius, who attended as Alexander’s deacon (Socrates, Church History 1.8), says the bishops wanted to use only the words of Scripture, found that Arius’s supporters could take each phrase in their own sense, and so wrote that the Son is “from the essence” of the Father and “one in essence” with him (Athanasius, Defence of the Nicene Definition 19–20). The creed calls the Son “begotten, not made” and “of one substance” with the Father, and condemns those who say there was a time when he was not (Creed of Nicaea (325)). The council condemned Arius and two Libyan bishops who stood by him (Council of Nicaea (325) synodal letter), and the emperor exiled Arius (Socrates, Church History 1.8).
The bishops also agreed that all churches should keep Easter on the same day and no longer follow the Jewish reckoning (Council of Nicaea (325) synodal letter) (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.18–19). Of their twenty canons, the fourth requires a bishop to be appointed by the bishops of his province, at least three being present and the rest consenting in writing, with confirmation left to the metropolitan (Council of Nicaea (325) canon 4). The sixth lets “the ancient customs” stand by which the bishop of Alexandria has authority over Egypt, Libya and Pentapolis, “since the like is customary for the Bishop of Rome also”, and keeps the privileges of Antioch and the other provinces (Council of Nicaea (325) canon 6). The seventh gives the bishop of Jerusalem a place of honour by ancient custom, saving the rights of the metropolis (Council of Nicaea (325) canon 7), and the twentieth has prayer said standing on Sundays and in the days of Pentecost (Council of Nicaea (325) canon 20).
The creed did not end the dispute: Athanasius records a series of rival formulas issued by later councils (Athanasius, On the Councils 21–30). The longer creed recited today is linked with the First Council of Constantinople of 381 (Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed). Chalcedon reaffirmed the creed of Nicaea (Definition of Chalcedon). The main traditions appeal to Nicaea in their own documents: the Catholic Church (Catechism of the Catholic Church 465), the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox (Orthodox–Oriental Orthodox Agreed Statement (1990) 8), the Church of the East (Common Christological Declaration (1994)), and the churches of the Reformation in their confessions (Augsburg Confession article 1) (Thirty-Nine Articles article 8).
How this is dated
Firm date. Fixed by contemporary documentation and not seriously disputed.
Socrates says that he found the date in the heading of the council’s record: 20 May in the consulship of Paulinus and Julian, which is 325 (Socrates, Church History 1.13). Eusebius says that the emperor completed the twentieth year of his reign about the time the council ended, and feasted the bishops (Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.15). The day comes from Socrates, who wrote more than a century later, so the timeline gives only the month.
Primary sources
Church History
- Socrates, Church History 1.5–6ccel.org
- Socrates, Church History 1.7ccel.org
- Socrates, Church History 1.13ccel.org
- Socrates, Church History 1.8ccel.org
Defence of the Nicene Definition (De Decretis)
- Athanasius, Defence of the Nicene Definition 3newadvent.org
- Athanasius, Defence of the Nicene Definition 19–20newadvent.org
Second Agreed Statement of the Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Oriental Orthodox Churches
- Orthodox–Oriental Orthodox Agreed Statement (1990) 8dss-syriacpatriarchate.org
Common Christological Declaration between the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East
- Common Christological Declaration (1994)vatican.va
The Augsburg Confession
- Augsburg Confession article 1bookofconcord.org
The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion
- Thirty-Nine Articles article 8churchofengland.org
In context
Grows out of
- AD 313, firm date
- about AD 49, estimated date
Leads to
- AD 359 to AD 360, firm date
- AD 367, firm date
- about AD 370 to AD 381, estimated date
- 27 February AD 380, firm date
- May AD 381, firm date
- 1 February AD 410, firm date
- 28 November 2025, firm date